Ещё одна монета с аука "Jean Elsen & ses Fils S.A." В 2008 году была продана за 120 EUR (~164 USD):

ASIE MINEURE, hecté (?), Faux de Becker en étain. Droit : Tête l. d'Apollon à droite. Revers : Carré creux quadriparti. Ref.: Hill, Becker, 106.
Fleur de Coin
Unc.

И вот вопрос-где Беккер видел оригинал этой монеты? 
На "Jean Elsen & ses Fils S.A" в 2008 году была продана за 120 EUR (~170 USD):

NIGRINIEN divinisé, aureus, Faux de Becker en étain. Droit : Tête à droite. Revers : Bûcher funéraire. Ref.: Hill, Becker, 256. Petite tache au droit.
Superbe/Fleur de Coin
EF/Unc.

Да, состарили толково.
И ещё по поводу качества беккеровок-в некоторых описаниях к редким и весьма дорогим монетам аукционы вынуждены открещиваться от работ Беккера и приводить факты в пользу подлинности продаваемых монет. Вот как в случае с этим статером TЕМЕСЫ, проданном на "
LHS Numismatik AG" в 2008 году аж за 52000 CHF (~50358 USD) !!! 

Magna Graecia, Bruttium, Temesa
Stater (Silver, 8.00 g 9), c. 450. Tripod with three ring handles, legs ending in lion´s paws, and with two double volutes below bowl; to left and right, greave. Rev. Corinthian helmet with crest to right. Basel 234 (same dies). Jameson 464. Extremely rare. Of remarkably fine quality, perhaps the finest known. Extremely fine.

И почитайте комментарий к монете-весьма интересно:

From the Star collection, ex Leu 86, 5 May 2003, 263. Not only is this issue extremely rare, it is also extremely controversial. The famous German forger, C.W. Becker (1772-1830) produced a very good copy of this coin in 1828 (Hill 14, from dies made in late 1827), and a number of scholars have assumed that all existing examples are forgeries (including, in an astonishing lapse, HN III, p. 193). This they cannot be. When examining the Basel piece, which shares the same die pair with the present coin (note the minor horizontal die break between the right and center tripod leg), one can easily see the usual three ring handles on top of the tripod bowl: the Becker piece has a single handle at the center. This vital difference seems to have escaped the observation of HN III, which unjustly condemned the piece of the same type illustrated by Garrucci (could that coin have previously served as Becker´s model?); it would be interesting to know when the first example of this coin was published. In any event, since one did appear in F. Carelli´s manuscript catalogue of 1812, at least 15 years before Becker made his dies, the comments in HN III can safely be discarded. (long after the completion of the manuscript and the death of the author in 1833, it was published with additions by C. Cavedoni as, Francisci Carellii Numorum Italiae Veteris Tabulas CCII [Leipzig, 1850]; see pp. iii and 97, and pl. CLXXVI).